4.6 Article

Arabidopsis mutants of sphingolipid fatty acid α-hydroxylases accumulate ceramides and salicylates

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 196, 期 4, 页码 1086-1097

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04351.x

关键词

ceramides; fatty acid alpha-hydroxylation; glucosylceramides; Golovinomyces cichoracearum; long-chain bases (LCBs); metabolite fingerprinting; salicylic acid (SA); Verticillium longisporum

资金

  1. DFG Research Unit FOR546 [Fe 446/6, Ka 1209/3, FL3 INST 186/822-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Arabidopsis, the fatty acid moiety of sphingolipids is mainly alpha-hydroxylated. The consequences of a reduction in this modification were analysed. Mutants of both Fatty Acid Hydroxylase genes (AtFAH1 and AtFAH2) were analysed for sphingolipid profiles. To elucidate further consequences of the mutations, metabolic analyses were performed and the influence on pathogen defence was determined. Ceramide and glucosylceramide profiles of double-mutant plants showed a reduction in sphingolipids with alpha-hydroxylated fatty acid moieties, and an accumulation of sphingolipids without these moieties. In addition, the free trihydroxylated long-chain bases and ceramides were increased by five- and ten-fold, respectively, whereas the amount of glucosylceramides was decreased by 25%. Metabolite analysis of the double mutant revealed salicylates as enriched metabolites. Infection experiments supported the metabolic changes, as the double mutant showed an enhanced disease-resistant phenotype for infection with the obligate biotrophic pathogen Golovinomyces cichoracearum. In summary, these results suggest that fatty acid hydroxylation of ceramides is important for the biosynthesis of complex sphingolipids. Its absence leads to the accumulation of long-chain bases and ceramides as their precursors. This increases salicylate levels and resistance towards obligate biotrophic fungal pathogens, confirming a role of sphingolipids in salicylic acid-dependent defence reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据