4.6 Article

Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 193, 期 2, 页码 481-493

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03951.x

关键词

angiosperm; character; complex leaves; development; rate of evolution; reversal; simple leaves; stasis

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB-0206336, DEB-0316614, DEB-0129376, DEB-0542958]
  2. German Research Foundation
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/41391/2007]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [0949759] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/41391/2007] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A wide range of factors (developmental, physiological, ecological) with unpredictable interactions control variation in leaf form. Here, we examined the distribution of leaf morphologies (simple and complex forms) across angiosperms in a phylogenetic context to detect patterns in the directions of changes in leaf shape. Seven datasets (diverse angiosperms and six nested clades, Sapindales, Apiales, Papaveraceae, Fabaceae, Lepidium, Solanum) were analysed using maximum likelihood and parsimony methods to estimate asymmetries in rates of change among character states. Simple leaves are most frequent among angiosperm lineages today, were inferred to be ancestral in angiosperms and tended to be retained in evolution (stasis). Complex leaves slowly originated (gains) and quickly reverted to simple leaves (losses) multiple times, with a significantly greater rate of losses than gains. Lobed leaves may be a labile intermediate step between different forms. The nested clades showed mixed trends; Solanum, like the angiosperms in general, had higher rates of losses than gains, but the other clades had higher rates of gains than losses. The angiosperm-wide pattern could be taken as a null model to test leaf evolution patterns in particular clades, in which patterns of variation suggest clade-specific processes that have yet to be investigated fully.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据