4.6 Article

Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of a NAC1 transcription factor in Medicago truncatula roots

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 191, 期 3, 页码 647-661

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03719.x

关键词

lateral root; microRNA; miR164; nodule; SINA

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Germany)
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR, France)
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN, Spain)
  4. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap [CLO/IWT/020714]
  5. Research Foundation-Flanders [G0066.07N]
  6. European Community [FOOD-CT-2004-506623]
  7. Ministere de la Recherche et de la Technologie (France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Legume roots develop two types of lateral organs, lateral roots and nodules. Nodules develop as a result of a symbiotic interaction with rhizobia and provide a niche for the bacteria to fix atmospheric nitrogen for the plant. The Arabidopsis NAC1 transcription factor is involved in lateral root formation, and is regulated post-transcriptionally by miRNA164 and by SINAT5-dependent ubiquitination. We analyzed in Medicago truncatula the role of the closest NAC1 homolog in lateral root formation and in nodulation. MtNAC1 shows a different expression pattern in response to auxin than its Arabidopsis homolog and no changes in lateral root number or nodulation were observed in plants affected in MtNAC1 expression. In addition, no interaction was found with SINA E3 ligases, suggesting that post-translational regulation of MtNAC1 does not occur in M. truncatula. Similar to what was found in Arabidopsis, a conserved miR164 target site was retrieved in MtNAC1, which reduced protein accumulation of a GFP-miR164 sensor. Furthermore, miR164 and MtNAC1 show an overlapping expression pattern in symbiotic nodules, and overexpression of this miRNA led to a reduction in nodule number. This work suggests that regulatory pathways controlling a conserved transcription factor are complex and divergent between M. truncatula and Arabidopsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据