4.6 Article

Divergent evolution of oxidosqualene cyclases in plants

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 193, 期 4, 页码 1022-1038

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03997.x

关键词

metabolic diversity; oxidosqualene cyclase (OSC); sterols; tandem duplication; triterpenes

资金

  1. 973 Program [2007CB108800]
  2. NNSF of China [30900114, 30670167, 30990242]
  3. BBSRC (UK)
  4. BBSRC [BBS/E/J/000C0644] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/J/000C0644, BBS/E/J/00000614, BB/C504435/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triterpenes are one of the largest classes of plant metabolites and have important functions. A diverse array of triterpenoid skeletons are synthesized via the isoprenoid pathway by enzymatic cyclization of 2,3-oxidosqualene. The genomes of the lower plants Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and moss (Physcomitrella patens) contain just one oxidosqualene cyclase (OSC) gene (for sterol biosynthesis), whereas the genomes of higher plants contain nine to 16 OSC genes. Here we carry out functional analysis of rice OSCs and rigorous phylogenetic analysis of 96 OSCs from higher plants, including Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Sorghum bicolor and Brachypodium distachyon. The functional analysis identified an amino acid sequence for isoarborinol synthase (OsIAS) (encoded by Os11g35710/OsOSC11) in rice. Our phylogenetic analysis suggests that expansion of OSC members in higher plants has occurred mainly through tandem duplication followed by positive selection and diversifying evolution, and consolidated the previous suggestion that dicot triterpene synthases have been derived from an ancestral lanosterol synthase instead of directly from their cycloartenol synthases. The phylogenetic trees are consistent with the reaction mechanisms of the protosteryl and dammarenyl cations which parent a wide variety of triterpene skeletal types, allowing us to predict the functions of the uncharacterized OSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据