4.6 Article

Root aeration via aerenchymatous phellem: three-dimensional micro-imaging and radial O2 profiles in Melilotus siculus

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 193, 期 2, 页码 420-431

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03934.x

关键词

aerenchyma; Melilotus siculus; micro-CT; multiscale model; oxygen; phellem; waterlogging

资金

  1. Research Council of K.U. Leuven [OT 08/023]
  2. Flanders Fund for Scientific Research [G.0603.08]
  3. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT) [SB/0991469]
  4. Danish Science Council
  5. A. W. Howard Memorial Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Internal root aeration enables waterlogging-tolerant species to grow in anoxic soil. Secondary aerenchyma, in the form of aerenchymatous phellem, is of importance to root aeration in some dicotyledonous species. Little is known about this type of aerenchyma in comparison with primary aerenchyma. Micro-computed tomography was employed to visualize, in three dimensions, the microstructure of the aerenchymatous phellem in roots of Melilotus siculus. Tissue porosity and respiration were also measured for phellem and stelar tissues. A multiscale, three-dimensional, diffusionrespiration model compared the predicted O2 profiles in roots with those measured using O2 microelectrodes. Micro-computed tomography confirmed the measured high porosity of aerenchymatous phellem (4454%) and the low porosity of stele (25%) A network of connected gas spaces existed in the phellem, but not within the stele. O2 partial pressures were high in the phellem, but fell below the detection limit in the thicker upper part of the stele, consistent with the poorly connected low porosity and high respiratory demand. The presented model integrates and validates micro-computed tomography with measured radial O2 profiles for roots with aerenchymatous phellem, confirming the existence of near-anoxic conditions at the centre of the stele in the basal parts of the root, coupled with only hypoxic conditions towards the apex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据