4.6 Article

A role for pectin de-methylesterification in a developmentally regulated growth acceleration in dark-grown Arabidopsis hypocotyls

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 188, 期 3, 页码 726-739

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03409.x

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; cell elongation; cell wall; cellulose; Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) microspectroscopy; hypocotyl; pectin de-methylesterification; transcriptome

资金

  1. French Ministry of Research and Technology [ACI BCMS195, ANR BLAN06-2_141830]
  2. EU [028974, 037704]
  3. University of Ghent
  4. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT, Vlaanderen)
  5. Research Foundation, Flanders (FWO, Vlaanderen) [IUAP VI/33]
  6. University of Antwerp
  7. DFG [BI 1417/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>We focused on a developmentally regulated growth acceleration in the dark-grown Arabidopsis hypocotyl to study the role of changes in cell wall metabolism in the control of cell elongation. To this end, precise transcriptome analysis on dissected dark-grown hypocotyls, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) microspectroscopy and kinematic analysis were used. Using a cellulose synthesis inhibitor, we showed that the growth acceleration marks a developmental transition during which growth becomes uncoupled from cellulose synthesis. We next investigated the cellular changes that take place during this transition. FT-IR microspectroscopy revealed significant changes in cell wall composition during, but not after, the growth acceleration. Transcriptome analysis suggested a role for cell wall remodeling, in particular pectin modification, in this growth acceleration. This was confirmed by the overexpression of a pectin methylesterase inhibitor, which caused a delay in the growth acceleration. This study shows that the acceleration of cell elongation marks a developmental transition in dark-grown hypocotyl cells and supports a role for pectin de-methylesterification in the timing of this event.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据