4.6 Article

Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display, spur length and flowering phenology in the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza lapponica

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 188, 期 2, 页码 385-392

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03296.x

关键词

deceptive orchids; female fitness; floral evolution; natural selection; plant-animal interactions; pollen limitation; pollinator-mediated selection; selection gradients

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Nonrewarding animal-pollinated plants commonly experience severe pollen limitation, which should result in strong selection on traits affecting the success of pollination. However, the importance of pollinators as selective agents on floral traits in deceptive species has not been quantified experimentally. Here, we quantified pollinator-mediated selection (Delta beta(poll)) on floral morphology and start of flowering in the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza lapponica by subtracting estimates of selection gradients for plants receiving supplemental hand-pollination from estimates obtained for open-pollinated control plants. There was directional selection for taller plants with more flowers and longer spurs, but no statistically significant selection on corolla size or flowering start. Pollinator-mediated selection accounted for all observed selection on spur length (Delta beta(poll) = 0.32), 76% of the selection on plant height (Delta beta(poll) = 0.19) and 42% of the selection on number of flowers (Delta beta(poll) = 0.30). Sixteen per cent of developing fruits were consumed by insect herbivores, but fruit herbivory had only minor effects on the strength of pollinator-mediated selection. Our results demonstrate that pollinators mediate selection on floral traits likely to affect both pollinator attraction and pollination efficiency, and are consistent with the hypothesis that deceptive species experience strong selection for increased display and mechanical fit between flower and pollinator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据