4.6 Article

Large-scale parallel 454 sequencing reveals host ecological group specificity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a boreonemoral forest

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 184, 期 2, 页码 424-437

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02920.x

关键词

454 sequencing; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; diversity; forest ecosystem; habitat specificity; host specificity; soil microbial community; SSU rDNA

资金

  1. Estonian Science Foundation [7371, 7366, 7738, SF0180098s08]
  2. EU [27552]
  3. European Community Framework Programme [PERG03-GA-2008-231034]
  4. European Regional Development Fund
  5. Tallinn University of Technology
  6. BiotaP LLC
  7. Scottish Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Knowledge of the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in natural ecosystems is a major bottleneck in mycorrhizal ecology. Here, we aimed to apply 454 sequencing - providing a new level of descriptive power - to assess the AMF diversity in a boreonemoral forest. 454 sequencing reads of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene of Glomeromycota were assigned to sequence groups by blast searches against a custom-made annotated sequence database. We detected 47 AMF taxa in the roots of 10 plant species in a 10 x 10 m plot, which is almost the same as the number of plant species in the whole studied forest. There was a significant difference between AMF communities in the roots of forest specialist plant species and in the roots of habitat generalist plant species. Forest plant species hosted 22 specialist AMF taxa, and the generalist plants shared all but one AMF taxon with forest plants, including globally distributed generalist fungi. These AMF taxa that have been globally recorded only in forest ecosystems were significantly over-represented in the roots of forest plant species. Our findings suggest that partner specificity in AM symbiosis may occur at the level of ecological groups, rather than at the species level, of both plant and fungal partners.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据