4.6 Article

The significance of phloem transport for the speed with which canopy photosynthesis and belowground respiration are linked

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 185, 期 1, 页码 189-203

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03050.x

关键词

canopy photosynthesis; carbon isotope discrimination; phloem transport; phloem water relations; soil respiration; speed of link

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G00725X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NERC [NE/G00725X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P> Ecosystem respiration is known to vary following changes in canopy photosynthesis. However, the timing of this coupling is not well understood. Here, we summarize the literature on soil and ecosystem respiration where the speed of transfer of photosynthetic sugars from the plant canopy via the phloem to the roots was determined. Estimates of the transfer speed can be grouped according to whether the study employed isotopic or canopy/soil flux-based techniques. These two groups should provide different estimates of transfer times because transport of sucrose molecules, and pressure-concentration waves, in phloem differ. A steady-state and a dynamic photosynthesis/phloem-transport/soil gas diffusion model were employed to interpret our results. Starch storage and partly soil gas diffusion affected transfer times, but phloem path-length strongly controlled molecule transfer times. Successful modelling required substantially different phloem properties (higher specific conductivity and turgor pressure difference) in tall compared with small plants, which is significant for our understanding of tall trees' physiology. Finally, we compared isotopic and flux-based approaches for the determination of the link between canopy photosynthesis and ecosystem respiration. We conclude that isotopic approaches are not well suited to document whether changes in photosynthesis of tall trees can rapidly affect soil respiration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据