4.7 Article

Sex Differences in the Presentation, Care, and Outcomes of Transient Ischemic Attack Results From the Ontario Stroke Registry

期刊

STROKE
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 255-257

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010485

关键词

ischemic attack; transient; registries; sex; stroke

资金

  1. Canadian Stroke Network
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC)
  3. MOHLTC
  4. Career Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation, Ontario Provincial Office

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose Little is known about whether sex differences exist in the presentation, management, and outcomes of transient ischemic attack. Methods We conducted a cohort study of 5991 consecutive patients with transient ischemic attack admitted to 11 stroke centers in Ontario, Canada, between July 1, 2003, and March 31, 2008 and compared presenting symptoms, processes of care, and outcomes in women and men. We used linkages to administrative databases to evaluate mortality and recurrent vascular events within 30 days and 1 year of the initial presentation, with multivariable analyses to assess whether sex differences persisted after adjustment for age and comorbid conditions. Results The most common presenting symptoms for both sexes were weakness, speech impairment, and sensory deficit, with headache being slightly more frequent in women. Women were less likely than men to undergo carotid imaging, carotid endarterectomy, or receive lipid-lowering therapy. One-year mortality was slightly lower in women than in men (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.94). Conclusions We found only minor sex differences in the presentation and management of transient ischemic attack, suggesting that current public awareness campaigns focusing on classic warning signs are appropriate for both women and men. Future work should focus on evaluating whether lower rates of carotid imaging, endarterectomy, and lipid-lowering therapy in women reflect undertreatment of women or are appropriate based on patient eligibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据