4.6 Article

Intraspecific competition reveals conditional fitness effects of single gene polymorphism at the Arabidopsis root growth regulator BRX

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 180, 期 1, 页码 71-80

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02553.x

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; brevis radix; competition; density; environmental stress; population structure; replacement series; root morphology

资金

  1. University of Lausanne
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [PPOOA-102944/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intraspecific genetic variation for morphological traits is observed in many organisms. In Arabidopsis thaliana, alleles responsible for intraspecific morphological variation are increasingly being identified. However, the fitness consequences remain unclear in most cases. Here the fitness effects of alleles of the BRX gene are investigated. A brx loss- Here, which was found in a natural accession, results in a highly branched of-function allele, but poorly elongated root system. Comparison between the control accession Sav-0 and an introgression of brx into this background (brx(s)) indicated that, surprisingly, brx loss of function did not negatively affect fitness in pure stands. However, in mixed, well-watered stands brxs performance and reproductive output decreased significantly, as the proportion of Sav-0 neighbors increased. Additional comparisons between brxs and a brxs line that was complemented by a BRX transgene confirmed a direct effect of the loss-of-function allele on plant performance, as indicated by restored competitive ability of the transgenic genotype. Further, because plant height was very similar across genotypes and because the experimental setup largely excluded shading effects, the impaired competitiveness of the brx loss-of-function genotype likely reflects below-ground competition. In summary, these data reveal conditional fitness effects of a single gene polymorphism in response to intraspecific competition in Arabidopsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据