4.6 Article

The dependence of exciton transport efficiency on spatial patterns of correlation within the spectral bath

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/095019

关键词

-

资金

  1. DARPA QuBE program [N66001-10-1-4060]
  2. DTRA [HDTRA1-10-1-0091 P00002]
  3. AFOSR [FA9550-09-1-0117]
  4. NSF MRSEC [DMR 08-02054]
  5. DOE Computational Science Graduate Fellowship
  6. DOE SCGF program
  7. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial correlations in spectral bath motions have been proposed to explain long-lived coherence in exciton transport. Systems of interest, ranging from photosynthetic complexes to organic photovoltaics, contain inhomogeneous environments. We consider the possibility that the degree of spatial correlation varies throughout an exciton transport system. We model exciton transport in the Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex (FMO), a photosynthetic light-harvesting complex. Although it remains unclear whether significant spatial correlations exist in FMO, its very high exciton transport efficiency makes it an interesting case for studies of exciton transport. We also simulate a highly symmetric ten-site model system. We use an extension of the environment-assisted quantum transport model to simulate transport, allowing the spatial correlation function to vary throughout the system. We demonstrate both via analysis and via simulation that exciton transport efficiency is most sensitive to changes in correlation between the site coupled to the trap and its neighboring sites. This asymmetry in sensitivity is highly robust and appears irrespective of changes in parameters such as transition dipole orientations and initial conditions. Our results suggest that in the design of exciton transport systems, efforts to increase efficiency by controlling spatial correlation should be focused on the region near the site of exciton trapping.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据