4.6 Article

The visible light-driven photocatalytic degradation of Alizarin red S using Bi-doped TiO2 nanoparticles

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 38, 期 7, 页码 3127-3136

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4nj00179f

关键词

-

资金

  1. UGC (Major Project), Government of India [41-364/2012(SR)]
  2. UICET, Panjab University, Chandigarh
  3. Ministry of Higher Education, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [PCSED-001-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we report the preparation of a series of Bi3+ -doped TiO2 nanopartides with different Bi-concentrations, i.e. 0.25-5% by a facile sol-gel process and their application as an efficient photocatalyst. The detailed characterization revealed that the Bi-doped TiO2 catalysts possess densely grown nanopartides, a high specific surface area, crystaine anatase TiO2 and good optical properties. The incorporation of Bi3+ into the TiO2 Lattice Led to the expansion of the TiO2 spectraL response into the visible Light region and the efficient separation of charge carriers. The prepared samples were employed for the photocatalytic degradation of Alizarin red S dye (ARS) under visible Light thumination. It was found that the incorporation of the Bi3+ ions in the TiO2 Lattice causes a marked improvement in the photocatakltic degradation of the ARS dye; however, the degradation efficiency depended upon the Bi+3 ion doping concentration and the dose of the prepared catalst. The detaild photocataltic experiments confirmed that the 1% Bi+3 ion doping concentration and 0.1 g L-1 dose exhibited the best photocataltic degradation efficiencies for the mod dye. Moreover, more than 80% degradation of ARS was observed by the prepared Bi-doped catalsts within 90 minutes under visibl Light. The synthesized Bi-doped TiO2 nanopartides reveald a superior photocatalic behavior towards the photocataltic degradation of ARS under similr experimental conditions, as compared to the synthesized TiO2 nanopartides and other commerciay availble derivatives (TiO2 PC-50 and TiO2 P25).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据