期刊
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 370, 期 19, 页码 1790-1798出版社
MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400590
关键词
-
资金
- Medtronic
- St. Jude Medical
- Boston Scientific
- Abbott Vascular
- Edwards Lifesciences
BackgroundWe compared transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR), using a self-expanding transcatheter aortic-valve bioprosthesis, with surgical aortic-valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and an increased risk of death during surgery. MethodsWe recruited patients with severe aortic stenosis who were at increased surgical risk as determined by the heart team at each study center. Risk assessment included the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predictor Risk of Mortality estimate and consideration of other key risk factors. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to TAVR with the self-expanding transcatheter valve (TAVR group) or to surgical aortic-valve replacement (surgical group). The primary end point was the rate of death from any cause at 1 year, evaluated with the use of both noninferiority and superiority testing. ResultsA total of 795 patients underwent randomization at 45 centers in the United States. In the as-treated analysis, the rate of death from any cause at 1 year was significantly lower in the TAVR group than in the surgical group (14.2% vs. 19.1%), with an absolute reduction in risk of 4.9 percentage points (upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval, -0.4; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.04 for superiority). The results were similar in the intention-to-treat analysis. In a hierarchical testing procedure, TAVR was noninferior with respect to echocardiographic indexes of valve stenosis, functional status, and quality of life. Exploratory analyses suggested a reduction in the rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and no increase in the risk of stroke. ConclusionsIn patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at increased surgical risk, TAVR with a self-expanding transcatheter aortic-valve bioprosthesis was associated with a significantly higher rate of survival at 1 year than surgical aortic-valve replacement. (Funded by Medtronic; U.S. CoreValve High Risk Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01240902.) Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a new self-expanding prosthesis was compared with surgical aortic-valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis who were at high surgical risk. The rate of death from any cause at 1 year was lower in the TAVR group. Aortic stenosis is a debilitating disease in elderly persons that carries a dismal prognosis after symptom onset.(1) Although surgical aortic-valve replacement remains the standard treatment for aortic stenosis,(2) many patients are not suitable candidates for surgical replacement owing to an increased risk of death during surgery.(3),(4) Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) with a balloon-expandable device improves survival, as compared with medical therapy, in patients with severe aortic stenosis who cannot undergo surgery.(5) Balloon-expandable TAVR and surgical aortic-valve replacement are associated with similar survival rates at 1 year among patients considered to be at high surgical risk, although the frequency of ...
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据