4.8 Article

Aspirin for Preventing the Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolism

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 366, 期 21, 页码 1959-1967

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114238

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Perugia
  2. Bayer HealthCare
  3. International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. Daiichi Sankyo
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. Sanofi-Aventis
  8. Pfizer
  9. Bayer Schering Pharma
  10. GlaxoSmithKline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background About 20% of patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism have a recurrence within 2 years after the withdrawal of oral anticoagulant therapy. Extending anticoagulation prevents recurrences but is associated with increased bleeding. The benefit of aspirin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism is unknown. Methods In this multicenter, investigator-initiated, double-blind study, patients with first-ever unprovoked venous thromboembolism who had completed 6 to 18 months of oral anticoagulant treatment were randomly assigned to aspirin, 100 mg daily, or placebo for 2 years, with the option of extending the study treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrence of venous thromboembolism, and major bleeding was the primary safety outcome. Results Venous thromboembolism recurred in 28 of the 205 patients who received aspirin and in 43 of the 197 patients who received placebo (6.6% vs. 11.2% per year; hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.93) (median study period, 24.6 months). During a median treatment period of 23.9 months, 23 patients taking aspirin and 39 taking placebo had a recurrence (5.9% vs. 11.0% per year; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.92). One patient in each treatment group had a major bleeding episode. Adverse events were similar in the two groups. Conclusions Aspirin reduced the risk of recurrence when given to patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism who had discontinued anticoagulant treatment, with no apparent increase in the risk of major bleeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据