4.8 Article

A Field Trial to Assess a Blood-Stage Malaria Vaccine

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 365, 期 11, 页码 1004-1013

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008115

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NCT00460525, N01AI85346, U19AI065683, HH-SN272200800013C]
  2. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health [D43TW001589]
  3. Department of Defense [W81XWH-06-1-0427]
  4. U.S. Agency for International Development for site development
  5. U.S. Agency for International Development
  6. Military Infectious Diseases Research Program
  7. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  8. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Blood-stage malaria vaccines are intended to prevent clinical disease. The malaria vaccine FMP2.1/AS02(A), a recombinant protein based on apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) from the 3D7 strain of Plasmodium falciparum, has previously been shown to have immunogenicity and acceptable safety in Malian adults and children. Methods In a double-blind, randomized trial, we immunized 400 Malian children with either the malaria vaccine or a control (rabies) vaccine and followed them for 6 months. The primary end point was clinical malaria, defined as fever and at least 2500 parasites per cubic millimeter of blood. A secondary end point was clinical malaria caused by parasites with the AMA1 DNA sequence found in the vaccine strain. Results The cumulative incidence of the primary end point was 48.4% in the malaria-vaccine group and 54.4% in the control group; efficacy against the primary end point was 17.4% (hazard ratio for the primary end point, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.09; P=0.18). Efficacy against the first and subsequent episodes of clinical malaria, as defined on the basis of various parasite-density thresholds, was approximately 20%. Efficacy against clinical malaria caused by parasites with AMA1 corresponding to that of the vaccine strain was 64.3% (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.86; P=0.03). Local reactions and fever after vaccination were more frequent with the malaria vaccine. Conclusions On the basis of the primary end point, the malaria vaccine did not provide significant protection against clinical malaria, but on the basis of secondary results, it may have strain-specific efficacy. If this finding is confirmed, AMA1 might be useful in a multicomponent malaria vaccine. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00460525.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据