4.8 Article

Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin for Clostridium difficile Infection

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 364, 期 5, 页码 422-431

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910812

关键词

-

资金

  1. Optimer Pharmaceuticals
  2. Merck
  3. Cubist Pharmaceuticals
  4. ViroPharma
  5. Cempra
  6. Iroko Pharmaceuticals
  7. Salix Pharmaceuticals
  8. Abbott
  9. Bayer
  10. Pfizer
  11. Genzyme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Clostridium difficile infection is a serious diarrheal illness associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Patients generally have a response to oral vancomycin or metronidazole; however, the rate of recurrence is high. This phase 3 clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin with those of vancomycin in treating C. difficile infection. METHODS Adults with acute symptoms of C. difficile infection and a positive result on a stool toxin test were eligible for study entry. We randomly assigned patients to receive fidaxomicin (200 mg twice daily) or vancomycin (125 mg four times daily) orally for 10 days. The primary end point was clinical cure (resolution of symptoms and no need for further therapy for C. difficile infection as of the second day after the end of the course of therapy). The secondary end points were recurrence of C. difficile infection (diarrhea and a positive result on a stool toxin test within 4 weeks after treatment) and global cure (i.e., cure with no recurrence). RESULTS A total of 629 patients were enrolled, of whom 548 (87.1%) could be evaluated for the per-protocol analysis. The rates of clinical cure with fidaxomicin were noninferior to those with vancomycin in both the modified intention-to-treat analysis (88.2% with fidaxomicin and 85.8% with vancomycin) and the per-protocol analysis (92.1% and 89.8%, respectively). Significantly fewer patients in the fidaxomicin group than in the vancomycin group had a recurrence of the infection, in both the modified intention-to-treat analysis (15.4% vs. 25.3%, P = 0.005) and the per-protocol analysis (13.3% vs. 24.0%, P = 0.004). The lower rate of recurrence was seen in patients with non-North American Pulsed Field type 1 strains. The adverse-event profile was similar for the two therapies. CONCLUSIONS The rates of clinical cure after treatment with fidaxomicin were noninferior to those after treatment with vancomycin. Fidaxomicin was associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrence of C. difficile infection associated with non-North American Pulsed Field type 1 strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据