4.8 Article

Dalteparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in Critically Ill Patients

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 364, 期 14, 页码 1305-1314

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014475

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MCT78568]
  2. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada [T6157, T6950, NA6186]
  3. Australian and New Zealand College of Anesthetists Research Foundation [07/23]
  4. Arjo Huntleigh
  5. Bayer Healthcare
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. Daiichi Sankyo
  8. Pfizer
  9. Sanofi-Aventis
  10. Covidien
  11. Leo Pharma
  12. Canyon Pharma
  13. GlaxoSmithKline
  14. Paringenix
  15. Schering-Plough/Organon
  16. GTI Diagnostics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The effects of thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin, as compared with unfractionated heparin, on venous thromboembolism, bleeding, and other outcomes are uncertain in critically ill patients. METHODS In this multicenter trial, we tested the superiority of dalteparin over unfractionated heparin by randomly assigning 3764 patients to receive either subcutaneous dalteparin (at a dose of 5000 IU once daily) plus placebo once daily (for parallel-group twice-daily injections) or unfractionated heparin (at a dose of 5000 IU twice daily) while they were in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome, proximal leg deep-vein thrombosis, was diagnosed on compression ultrasonography performed within 2 days after admission, twice weekly, and as clinically indicated. Additional testing for venous thromboembolism was performed as clinically indicated. Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS There was no significant between-group difference in the rate of proximal leg deep-vein thrombosis, which occurred in 96 of 1873 patients (5.1%) receiving dalteparin versus 109 of 1873 patients (5.8%) receiving unfractionated heparin (hazard ratio in the dalteparin group, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 1.23; P = 0.57). The proportion of patients with pulmonary emboli was significantly lower with dalteparin (24 patients, 1.3%) than with unfractionated heparin (43 patients, 2.3%) (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.88; P = 0.01). There was no significant between-group difference in the rates of major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.34; P = 0.98) or death in the hospital (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.05; P = 0.21). In prespecified per-protocol analyses, the results were similar to those of the main analyses, but fewer patients receiving dalteparin had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.98; P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS Among critically ill patients, dalteparin was not superior to unfractionated heparin in decreasing the incidence of proximal deep-vein thrombosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据