4.8 Article

STAT1 Mutations in Autosomal Dominant Chronic Mucocutaneous Candidiasis

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 365, 期 1, 页码 54-61

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100102

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  2. Primary Immunodeficiency Association UK
  3. European Union [Health-F5-2009-223143]
  4. Aneuploidy Project [LSHG-CT-2006-37627]
  5. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW) [917.66.36]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) is characterized by susceptibility to candida infection of skin, nails, and mucous membranes. Patients with recessive CMC and autoimmunity have mutations in the autoimmune regulator AIRE. The cause of autosomal dominant CMC is unknown. Methods We evaluated 14 patients from five families with autosomal dominant CMC. We incubated their peripheral-blood mononuclear cells with different combinations of stimuli to test the integrity of pathways that mediate immunity, which led to the selection of 100 genes that were most likely to contain the genetic defect. We used an array-based sequence-capture assay, followed by next-generation sequencing, to identify mutations. Results The mononuclear cells from the affected patients were characterized by poor production of interferon-gamma, interleukin-17, and interleukin-22, suggesting that the defect lay within the interleukin-12 receptor and interleukin-23 receptor signaling pathways. We identified heterozygous missense mutations in the DNA sequence encoding the coiled-coil (CC) domain of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) in the patients. These mutations lead to defective responses in type 1 and type 17 helper T cells (Th1 and Th17). The interferon-gamma receptor pathway was intact in these patients. Conclusions Mutations in the CC domain of STAT1 underlie autosomal dominant CMC and lead to defective Th1 and Th17 responses, which may explain the increased susceptibility to fungal infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据