4.7 Article

Multipotent Caudal Neural Progenitors Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells That Give Rise to Lineages of the Central and Peripheral Nervous System

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 1759-1770

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/stem.1991

关键词

Roof plate; Floor plate; Neural crest; Peripheral nervous system; Human embryonic stem cells

资金

  1. University of Melbourne
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [NHMRC: 520165]
  3. Australian Research Council Initiative Stem Cells Australia
  4. Friedreich Ataxia Research Association (Australasia)
  5. Friedreich Ataxia Research Alliance (USA)
  6. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The caudal neural plate is a distinct region of the embryo that gives rise to major progenitor lineages of the developing central and peripheral nervous system, including neural crest and floor plate cells. We show that dual inhibition of the glycogen synthase kinase 3 and activin/nodal pathways by small molecules differentiate human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) directly into a preneuroepithelial progenitor population we named caudal neural progenitors (CNPs). CNPs coexpress caudal neural plate and mesoderm markers, and, share high similarities to embryonic caudal neural plate cells in their lineage differentiation potential. Exposure of CNPs to BMP2/4, sonic hedgehog, or FGF2 signaling efficiently directs their fate to neural crest/roof plate cells, floor plate cells, and caudally specified neuroepithelial cells, respectively. Neural crest derived from CNPs differentiated to neural crest derivatives and demonstrated extensive migratory properties in vivo. Importantly, we also determined the key extrinsic factors specifying CNPs from human embryonic stem cell include FGF8, canonical WNT, and IGF1. Our studies are the first to identify a multipotent neural progenitor derived from hPSCs, that is the precursor for major neural lineages of the embryonic caudal neural tube. Stem Cells2015;33:1759-1770

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据