4.7 Article

Transcriptional Hallmarks of Heterogeneous Neural Stem Cell Niches of the Subventricular Zone

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 33, 期 7, 页码 2232-2242

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/stem.2017

关键词

Fate specification; Neural stem cell; Regionalization; Transcriptome; Subventricular zone; Postnatal neurogenesis

资金

  1. Swiss National Research Project [NRP63, 406340_128291]
  2. Swiss National Fund [31003A_127082]
  3. Mexican Government (CONACYT)
  4. Forschungskredit from the University of Zurich [K-41211-01-01]
  5. Programme Avenir Lyon Saint-Etienne
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG SFB592, TA-310-1, TA-310-2]
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_143767]
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_127082, 310030_143767, 406340_128291] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Throughout postnatal life in mammals, neural stem cells (NSCs) are located in the subventricular zone (SVZ) of the lateral ventricles. The greatest diversity of neuronal and glial lineages they generate occurs during early postnatal life in a region-specific manner. In order to probe heterogeneity of the postnatal SVZ, we microdissected its dorsal and lateral walls at different postnatal ages and isolated NSCs and their immediate progeny based on their expression of Hes5-EGFP/Prominin1 and Ascl1-EGFP, respectively. Whole genome comparative transcriptome analysis revealed transcriptional regulators as major hallmarks that sustain postnatal SVZ regionalization. Manipulation of single genes encoding for locally enriched transcription factors (loss-of-function or ectopic gain-of-function in vivo) influenced NSC specification indicating that the fate of regionalized postnatal SVZ-NSCs can be readily modified. These findings reveal the pronounced transcriptional heterogeneity of the postnatal SVZ and provide targets to recruit region-specific lineages in regenerative contexts. Stem Cells 2015;33:2232-2242

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据