4.3 Article

Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells in Liver Fibrosis: Recent Findings, Old/New Caveats and Future Perspectives

期刊

STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 586-597

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-015-9585-9

关键词

Cirrhosis; Mesenchymal stem cells; Neural crest; Hepatocyte-like cells; IGF-I; Biosafety; Cell source; Biodistribution; Mechanisms

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) (PICT PRH) [51]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) (PICT) [2008 00123]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) (PICTO) [2008 00122]
  4. Universidad Austral

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are progenitors which share plastic-adherence capacity and cell surface markers but have different properties according to their cell and tissue sources and to culture conditions applied. Many recent publications suggest that MSCs can differentiate into hepatic-like cells, which can be a consequence of either a positive selection of rare in vivo pluripotent cells or of the original plasticity of some cells contributing to MSC cultures. A possible role of MSCs in hereditary transmission of obesity and/or diabetes as well as properties of MSCs regarding immunomodulation, cell fusion and exosome release capacities are discussed according to recent literature. Limitations in methods used to track MSCs in vivo especially in the context of liver cirrhosis are addressed as well as strategies explored to enhance their migratory, survival and proliferation properties, which are known to be relevant for their future clinical use. Current knowledge regarding mechanisms involved in liver cirrhosis amelioration mediated by na < ve and genetically modified MSCs as well as the effects of applying preconditioning and combined strategies to improve their therapeutic effects are evaluated. Finally, first reports of GMP guidelines and biosafety issues in MSCs applications are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据