4.4 Article

Cytotoxicity of dopaminochrome in the mesencephalic cell line, MN9D, is dependent upon oxidative stress

期刊

NEUROTOXICOLOGY
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 1030-1035

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.07.006

关键词

Neurodegeneration; Parkinson disease; Dopamine; Glutathione; Oxidation

资金

  1. NIGMS [008306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson disease is a specific form of neurodegeneration characterized by a loss of nigra-striatal dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain of humans. The disease is also characterized by an increase in oxidative stress and a loss of glutathione in the midbrain region. A potential link between all these factors is the oxidation of dopamine to dopaminochrome (DAC). Using the murine mesencephalic cell line MN9D, we have shown that DAC [50-250 mu M] leads to cell death in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas oxidized L-dopa, dopachrome [50-250 mu M] is only toxic at the highest concentration used. Furthermore, chronic exposure of MN9D cells to low concentrations of DAC [50-100 mu M] is cytotoxic between 48 and 96 h. DAC also increases superoxide production within MN9D cells as indicated by dihydroethidium fluorescence, that can be prevented by co-administration with the antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine [5 mM]. Moreover, the cytotoxicity induced by DAC can also be prevented by administration of N-acetylcysteine [1-5 mM]. Finally, depletion of reduced glutathione in MN9D cells by buthionine sulfoximine 150-100 mu M] administration significantly enhances the cytotoxic effect of low concentrations of DAC [50-100 mu M] and DAC 1175 mu M] itself reduces the proportion of oxidized glutathione in total glutathione within 30 min of administration in MN9D cells. Overall, we have shown that DAC causes MN91) cell death in an oxidatively dependent manner that appears closely linked with a rapid loss of reduced glutathione. These findings have implications for understanding the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative pathways in Parkinson disease. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据