4.4 Article

Effect of an experimental proteasome inhibitor on the cytoskeleton, cytosolic protein turnover, and induction in the neuronal cells in vitro

期刊

NEUROTOXICOLOGY
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 232-243

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.11.003

关键词

GT-1 neurons; ubiquitin-proteasome system; protein aggregates; stress response; immunohistochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GT-1 murine neuronal cells exposed to an experimental proteasome inhibitor (EPI) for 24 h showed increased cell death via a non-apoptotic mechanism, as assessed by TUNEL and DNA fragmentation assays. Immunofluorescence staining demonstrated that EPI induced reorganization and relocation of non-ubiquinated actin microfilaments and microtubules to the perinuclear region in EPI treated cells. Immunohistochemistry analysis also demonstrated that other non-cytoskeletal proteins became ubiquitinated and/or upregulated including ubiquitin and other stress proteins. Perinuclear-centrosomal accumulation of gamma-tubulin and vimentin, key components of aggresomes, was observed in the EPI treated cells. Biochemical analysis indicated that EPI-induced accumulation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates in GT-1 cells was detergent- and mechanical disruption resistant, a feature of aggresomes. Similar results were observed in GT-1 cells treated with lactacystin, a prototypical proteasome inhibitor, which is structurally dissimilar to EPI indicating a pharmacologic effect. In conclusion, EPI causes cytoskeletal reorganization and accumulation of diverse ubiquitinated and non-ubiquitinated proteins in the perinuclear region and potentially overloads the endoplasmic reticulum-dependent quality control mechanism. These processes acting alone, or in combination, are hypothesized to affect axonal transport or other aspects of cellular homeostasis and thus, represent events potentially relevant to the development of peripheral neuropathy associated with administration of proteasome inhibitors in nonclinical studies. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据