4.4 Article

The Mitochondrial ATP-Sensitive Potassium Channel Blocker 5-Hydroxydecanoate Inhibits Toxicity of 6-Hydroxydopamine on Dopaminergic Neurons

期刊

NEUROTOXICITY RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 82-95

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12640-009-9010-8

关键词

6-OHDA; Mitok(ATP) channels; Dopamine; Parkinson's disease; Oxidative stress; Mitochondria; Neurodegeneration

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education [BFU2006-07414]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Health [RD06/0010/0013]
  3. Galician Government (XUGA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine is commonly used in models of Parkinson's disease, and a potential factor in the pathogenesis of the disease. However, the mechanisms responsible for 6-hydroxydopamine-induced dopaminergic degeneration have not been totally clarified. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) derived from 6-OHDA uptake and intraneuronal autooxidation, extracellular 6-OHDA autooxidation, and microglial activation have been involved. The mitochondrial implication is controversial. Mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K (mitoK(ATP)) channels may provide a convergent target that could integrate these different mechanisms. We observed that in primary mesencephalic cultures and neuron-enriched cultures, treatment with the mitoK(ATP) channel blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate, inhibits the dopaminergic degeneration induced by low doses of 6-OHDA. Furthermore, 5-hydroxydecanoate blocks the 6-OHDA-induced decrease in mitochondrial inner membrane potential and inhibits 6-OHDA-induced generation of superoxide-derived ROS in dopaminergic neurons. The results suggest that low doses of 6-OHDA may generate low levels of ROS through several mechanisms, which may be insufficient to induce neuron death. However, they could act as a trigger to activate mitoK(ATP) channels, thereby enhancing ROS production and the subsequent dopaminergic degeneration. Furthermore, the present study provides additional data for considering mitoK(ATP) channels as a potential target for neuroprotection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据