4.6 Review

Repeat-Associated Non-AUG Translation and Its Impact in Neurodegenerative Disease

期刊

NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 721-731

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-014-0292-z

关键词

Fragile X; Polyglutamine; C9orf72; Translation initiation; Myotonic dystrophy; ALS

资金

  1. M-Cubed Initiative
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs (BLRD) [11212652]
  3. NIH [R01NS086810, K08NS069809, P30-AG13283, F32NS089124]
  4. Harris Professorship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleotide repeat expansions underlie numerous human neurological disorders. Repeats can trigger toxicity through multiple pathogenic mechanisms, including RNA gain-of-function, protein gain-of-function, and protein loss-of-function pathways. Traditionally, inference of the underlying pathogenic mechanism derives from the repeat location, with dominantly inherited repeats within transcribed noncoding sequences eliciting toxicity predominantly as RNA via sequestration of specific RNA binding proteins. However, recent findings question this assumption and suggest that repeats outside of annotated open reading frames may also trigger toxicity through a novel form of protein translational initiation known as repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation. To date, RAN translation has been implicated in 4 nucleotide repeat expansion disorders: spinocerebellar ataxia type 8; myotonic dystrophy type 1 with CTGaEuro cent CAG repeats; C9orf72 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia with GGGGCCaEuro cent GGCCCC repeats; and fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome with CGG repeats. RAN translation contributes to hallmark pathological characteristics in these disorders by producing homopolymeric or dipeptide repeat proteins. Here, we review what is known about RAN translation, with an emphasis on how differences in both repeat sequence and context may confer different requirements for unconventional initiation. We then discuss how this new mechanism of translational initiation might function in normal physiology and lay out a roadmap for addressing the numerous questions that remain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据