4.6 Review

Molecular Biomarkers of Epileptogenesis

期刊

NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 319-323

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-014-0261-6

关键词

Cerebrospinal fluid; epilepsy; plasma; seizures; traumatic brain injury

资金

  1. EpiTarget
  2. EuroEpinomics [SFB 1089, KFO 177]
  3. DFG
  4. Else Kroner-Fresenius
  5. German Israeli Foundations
  6. BonFor
  7. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [DNP/N119/ESF-EuroEPINOMICS/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epileptogenesis, a process leading to a reduced threshold for seizures after transient brain insults, as well as the mechanisms underlying the propensity to generate spontaneous epileptic seizures, are highly dynamic processes. Biomarkers-objective measures of biological processes-would be excellent tools for monitoring epileptogenesis and the dynamics of increased seizure propensity, as well as the potential to interfere, for example pharmacologically, with these key pathological aspects of epilepsy. Molecular biomarkers have revolutionized therapies, as well as response prediction and monitoring of therapies in other biomedical fields. However, high-impact molecular biomarkers are still not available in the context of epilepsy. Several factors, such as the large heterogeneity of epileptic syndromes and their underlying pathological patterns, as well as the limited availability of tissue samples, represent a particular challenge to the development of molecular biomarkers in epileptogenesis and epilepsy. However, substantial technical progress has been made recently with respect to biomarker characterization and monitoring by large throughput analysis on the genomic, mRNA, and proteomic levels, starting from minute amounts of brain tissue or body fluids, for example cerebrospinal fluid, blood, serum, or plasma. Given the substantial cellular-and network-level functional pathophysiology involved in epilepsy, it may be beneficial in the future to combine molecular analysis with other methods, such as imaging and electrophysiological biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据