4.6 Review

Gene Therapy for the Nervous System: Challenges and New Strategies

期刊

NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 817-839

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-014-0299-5

关键词

Gene delivery; Central nervous system; Virus vector; Nonviral gene delivery; Gene therapy

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) by the NIH Common Fund, through the Office of Strategic Coordination/Office of the NIH [U19 CA179563]
  2. Voices Against Brain Cancer
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) training grant [T32 DA007237]
  4. NIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [R01 NS086570-01]
  5. Shriners Hospitals for Children [85110-PHI-14]
  6. NIH/NINDS [R21 NS081374-01]
  7. [CA069246]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current clinical treatments for central nervous system (CNS) diseases, such as Parkinson's disease and glioblastoma do not halt disease progression and have significant treatment morbidities. Gene therapy has the potential to permanently correct disease by bringing in a normal gene to correct a mutant gene deficiency, knocking down mRNA of mutant alleles, and inducing cell-death in cancer cells using transgenes encoding apoptosis-inducing proteins. Promising results in clinical trials of eye disease (Leber's congenital aumorosis) and Parkinson's disease have shown that gene-based neurotherapeutics have great potential. The recent development of genome editing technology, such as zinc finger nucleases, TALENS, and CRISPR, has made the ultimate goal of gene correction a step closer. This review summarizes the challenges faced by gene-based neurotherapeutics and the current and recent strategies designed to overcome these barriers. We have chosen the following challenges to focus on in this review: (1) delivery vehicles (both virus and nonviral), (2) use of promoters for vector-mediated gene expression in CNS, and (3) delivery across the blood-brain barrier. The final section (4) focuses on promising pre-clinical/clinical studies of neurotherapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据