4.6 Review

Vascular Cognitive Impairment: Disease Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications

期刊

NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 361-373

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-011-0047-z

关键词

Vascular cognitive impairment; Vascular dementia; Mechanisms; Therapeutics

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P30 AG024824-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is likely to increase as the population ages and cardiovascular disease survival improves. We provide an overview of the definition and disease mechanisms of VCI and present a systematic literature review of the current evidence for the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies used to treat the VCI symptoms of cognitive dysfunction or to modify VCI through primary and secondary prevention. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was searched from 2005 to October 2010 using the keywords vascular dementia or vascular cognitive impairment and therapy. MEDLINE was searched for English-language articles published within the last 10 years using the combined Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) therapeutics and dementia, vascular or vascular cognitive impairment. Although cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine produce small cognitive improvements in patients with VCI, these drugs do not improve global clinical outcomes and have adverse effects and costs. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers may improve short-term cognitive function in patients with VCI. Antihypertensive therapy with an ACE inhibitor-based regimen and statins may prevent the major subtype of VCI known as poststroke cognitive decline. Clinical and effectiveness studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the benefits and risks of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies to prevent and treat VCI. Given its growing health, social, and economic burden, the prevention and treatment of VCI are critical priorities for clinical care and research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据