4.6 Review

Therapy of collagen VI-related myopathies (Bethlem and Ullrich)

期刊

NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 613-618

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.08.004

关键词

Bethlem myopathy; Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy; collagen VI; outcome measures; therapy

资金

  1. Italian Health Ministry [RF 2005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The collagen VI-related myopathies comprise two major forms, Bethlem myopathy (BM) and Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy (UCMD), which show a variable combination of muscle wasting and weakness, joint contractures, distal laxity, and respiratory compromise. Specific diagnosis requires molecular genetic testing showing mutation in one of the three genes involved. This review summarizes current treatments, in particular indication for physiotherapy, orthopedic treatment for correction of foot deformity, scoliosis, and flexion contractures of elbows, and treatment of respiratory failure. The turning point in basic research on collagen VI myopathies was the discovery of an unexpected mitochondrial dysfunction as a pathogenetic mechanism underlying the myopathic syndrome seen in Col6a1 null mice. Treatment of Col6a1(-/-) mice with cyclosporin A (CsA) rescued the mitochondrial dysfunction and decreased apoptosis. Similar mitochondrial defects were revealed in cultures of UCMD patients. The results of an open pilot trial with CsA in five patients with collagen VI-related myopathies are summarized and discussed. With the availability of new potential effective treatments, several challenges must be addressed in conducting trials in orphan diseases and in neuromuscular disorders in particular. Outcome measures are discussed in the context of the expected effect of the cure. Randomized clinical trials often are not feasible for rare diseases, and sometimes would be ethically inappropriate. The need to develop alternative outcome measures or biomarkers using platforms such as genomics and proteomics is stressed in this context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据