4.5 Article

Combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation

期刊

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 34, 期 25, 页码 3298-3317

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6553

关键词

fractional polynomials; multivariable fractional polynomials; multiple imputation; missing data

资金

  1. International Trauma Research Network
  2. Medical Research Council [U105260558]
  3. UK Medical Research Council [U105260558]
  4. MRC [MC_U105260558, MC_UU_12023/21] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12023/21, MC_U105260558] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) models are commonly used in medical research. The datasets in which MFP models are applied often contain covariates with missing values. To handle the missing values, we describe methods for combining multiple imputation with MFP modelling, considering in turn three issues: first, how to impute so that the imputation model does not favour certain fractional polynomial (FP) models over others; second, how to estimate the FP exponents in multiply imputed data; and third, how to choose between models of differing complexity. Two imputation methods are outlined for different settings. For model selection, methods based on Wald-type statistics and weighted likelihood-ratio tests are proposed and evaluated in simulation studies. The Wald-based method is very slightly better at estimating FP exponents. Type I error rates are very similar for both methods, although slightly less well controlled than analysis of complete records; however, there is potential for substantial gains in power over the analysis of complete records. We illustrate the two methods in a dataset from five trauma registries for which a prognostic model has previously been published, contrasting the selected models with that obtained by analysing the complete records only. (c) 2015 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据