4.6 Article

O-6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) Immunohistochemical Expression in Pituitary Corticotroph Adenomas

期刊

NEUROSURGERY
卷 70, 期 2, 页码 491-496

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318230ac63

关键词

Crooke cell adenoma; Cushing disease; MGMT; Pituitary adenoma; Silent corticotroph adenoma; Temozolomide

资金

  1. Jarislowsky Foundation
  2. Lloyd Carr-Harris Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair enzyme that counteracts chemotherapeutic cytotoxicity of alkylating agents such as temozolomide. Low levels of MGMT expression have been shown to correlate with longer survival in glioma patients treated with temozolomide. The same is true in pituitary adenomas. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the immunohistochemical expression of MGMT in a variety of corticotroph adenoma subtypes to determine the potential utility of temozolomide as a therapeutic agent. METHODS: The tumors consisted of 40 cases of adrenocorticotropin-secreting pituitary tumors in Cushing disease, 12 Crooke cell adenomas, and 7 subtype I silent corticotroph adenomas. Staining for MGMT was assessed by light microscopy; nuclear reactivity was estimated semiquantitatively as present in < 10%, 10% to 25%, 25% to 50%, 50% to 75%, and > 75% of cells. RESULTS: Immunoexpression showed no correlation with patient age, sex, tumor size, invasiveness, or recurrence in patients with Cushing disease. Among adrenocorticotropin- secreting adenomas associated with Cushing disease, most invasive (60%) and recurrent (86%) tumors showed low MGMT immunopositivity, defined as < 25%. Most (75%) Crooke cell adenomas exhibited an MGMT immunoreactivity of <= 50%. All subtype I silent corticotroph adenomas showed < 10% MGMT staining. CONCLUSION: Our descriptive findings of low MGMT expression in adrenocorticotropin- producing pituitary adenomas, particularly aggressive tumors, suggest that they may be suitable candidates for temozolomide therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据