4.6 Article

Current Surgical Outcomes for Cranial Base Chordomas: Cohort Study of 95 Patients

期刊

NEUROSURGERY
卷 70, 期 6, 页码 1355-1360

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182446783

关键词

Chordoma; Microsurgery; Neurosurgery; Skull base neoplasms; Skull base surgery; Surgical outcomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Chordomas of the skull base are locally aggressive neoplasms for which maximal surgical resection confers prolonged survival. OBJECTIVE: To present the largest consecutive surgical series of cranial base chordomas to date, including complications, functional outcome, and overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in early and late eras of our experience. METHODS: From 1988 to 2011, 95 patients with cranial base chordomas were treated, including 56 patients from 1988 to 1999 and 39 from 2000 to 2011. Mean age and average follow-up were 42.6 +/- 16.8 years and 38.3 +/- 38.5 months, respectively. A historically controlled study design was implemented comparing both eras with respect to 5-year OS, RFS, Karnofsky performance scale at last-follow-up, and complications. RESULTS: Mean 5-year OS and RFS for the entire cohort was 74% +/- 6% and 56% +/- 8%, respectively. Complete resection rates were similar between groups (68% and 74%, respectively; P = .494). In the 2000 to 2011 era, overall (26%), cranial nerve (10%), vascular (3%), and systemic (0%) complications were less frequent than in the 1988 to 1999 era. Patients in the 2000 to 2011 era were 1.50 times more likely to have a Karnofsky performance scale >= 70 than in the 1988 to 1999 era (95% confidence interval 1.15-1.94; P = .003). There was no significant difference in 5-year RFS between the 1988 to 1999 and 2000 to 2011 eras. Five-year OS was higher in the 2000 to 2011 era (93% +/- 6% vs 64% +/- 8% for the 1988-1999 era; P = .012). CONCLUSION: Aggressive surgical resection implementing contemporary skull base approaches can be performed with an acceptable complication profile with preservation of functional status, while conferring a similar OS and RFS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据