4.6 Article

Outcome Predictors of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastases

期刊

NEUROSURGERY
卷 69, 期 6, 页码 1232-1239

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822b2fdc

关键词

Brain metastases; Gamma Knife; Renal cell carcinoma; Stereotactic radiosurgery

资金

  1. AB Elekta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Although whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been a standard palliative management for brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma, its benefit has been elusive because of radiobiological resistance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: We reviewed records from 158 consecutive patients (men = 111, women = 47) who underwent SRS for 531 brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. The median patient age was 61 years (range, 38-83 years), and the median number of tumors per patient was 1 (range, 1-10). Seventy-nine patients (50%) had solitary brain metastasis. Fifty-seven patients (36%) underwent prior WBRT. The median total tumor volume for each patient was 3.0 cm(3) (range, 0.09-47 cm(3)). RESULTS: The overall survival after SRS was 60%, 38%, and 19% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, with a median survival of 8.2 months. Factors associated with longer survival included younger age, longer interval between primary diagnosis and brain metastases, lower recursive partitioning analysis class, higher Karnofsky performance status, smaller number of brain metastases, and no prior WBRT. Median survival for patients with < 2 brain metastases, higher Karnofsky performance status (> 90), and no prior WBRT was 12 months after SRS. Sustained local tumor control was achieved in 92% of patients. Symptomatic adverse radiation effects occurred in 7%. Overall, 70% of patients improved or remained neurologically stable. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic radiosurgery is an especially valuable option for patients with higher Karnofsky performance status and smaller number of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据