4.6 Article

Differential Expression of Genes in Elastase-Induced Saccular Aneurysms With High and Low Aspect Ratios

期刊

NEUROSURGERY
卷 66, 期 3, 页码 578-584

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365769.78334.8C

关键词

Aspect ratio; Gene expression; Saccular aneurysm

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS42646]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Morphologic features are thought to play a critical role in the rupture of intracranial, saccular aneurysms. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the gene expression pattern of saccular aneurysms with distinct morphologic patterns. METHODS: Elastase-induced saccular aneurysms with high (>= 2.4) and low (<= 1.6) aspect ratios (ARs) (height to neck width) were created in 15 rabbits (n = 9 for high AR and n = 6 for low AR). RNA was isolated from the aneurysms and analyzed using a microarray containing 294 rabbit genes of interest. Genes with a statistically significant difference between low and high AR (P < .05) and a fold change of >= 1.5 and <= 0.75 to represent up-and downregulation in high AR compared with low AR were used to identify pathways for further investigation. RESULTS: Fourteen genes (4.8%) were differentially expressed in high-AR aneurysms compared with low-AR aneurysms. The expression of osteopontin, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase, haptoglobin, cathepsin L, collagen VIII,. bronectin, galectin 3, secreted frizzled-related protein 2, CD14, decorin, and annexin I were up-regulated, whereas the expression of myosin light chain kinase, Fas antigen, and CD34 were down-regulated in high-AR aneurysms. CONCLUSION: In a rabbit model of saccular aneurysm, high AR was associated with differential expression of in. ammatory/immunomodulatory genes, structural genes, genes related to proteolytic enzymes and extracellular matrix-related genes. These findings may focus efforts on targets aimed at avoiding spontaneous rupture of intracranial, saccular aneurysms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据