4.6 Article

MULTIFOCAL COMPLEX GLIONEURONAL TUMOR IN AN ELDERLY MAN: AN AUTOPSY STUDY: CASE REPORT

期刊

NEUROSURGERY
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 1193-1195

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000345640.40566.48

关键词

Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor; Multicentricity; Pilocytic astrocytoma; Rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor; Third ventricle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: The clinicopathological spectra of a dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT) and a rosetteforming glioneuronal tumor (RGNT) are expanding. We report here the autopsy findings of a case of complex glioneuronal tumor with combined histological features of both a DNT and an RGNT. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 79-year-old man presented with a 1-month history of confusion and gait difficulties. A magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed obstructive hydrocephalus attributed to a mass in the posterior third ventricle. INTERVENTION: A third ventriculostomy was performed. Postoperatively, the mass remained unchanged in size for more than 14 months. Thirty-eight months after his initial manifestations, he experienced minor head trauma and was then hospitalized. Despite placement of an external for ventricular drain and other supportive treatment, he deteriorated and died. A full autopsy was performed, with emphasis on the brain. The mass lesion and a few independent microfoci situated primarily around the third ventricle showed histological features of pilocytic astrocytoma with recurrent hemorrhage. Far more numerous were microfoci with histological features of a DNT, including floating neurons, as well as typical RGNIT-associated, synaptophysin-positive rosettes and perivascular pseudo-rosettes. CONCLUSION: The advanced age of the patient, the coexisting histological features of the DNT and RGNT, and the distinctive anatomic distribution of the lesions, being centered on the third ventricle, may lend insight into the histogenetic relationship of a DNT, an RGNT, and mixed glioneuronal tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据