4.3 Article

The in vitro maintenance of clock genes expression within the rat pineal gland under standard and norepinephrine-synchronized stimulation

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 81-82, 期 -, 页码 1-10

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.03.005

关键词

Pineal gland; Melatonin; Norepinephrine; AANAT; Clock genes

资金

  1. FAPESP [2011/04359-8, 09/52920-0, 2007/07790-6]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [09/52920-0, 11/04359-8] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the norepinephrine (NE) synchronization protocol was proved to be an important procedure for further modulating in vitro pineal melatonin synthesis, the maintenance of clock genes under the same conditions remained to be investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the maintenance of the clock genes expression in pineal gland cultures under standard and NE-synchronized stimulation. The glands were separated into three experimental groups: Control, Standard (acute NE-stimulation), and NE-synchronized. The expression of Bmal1, Per2, Cry2, Rev-erb alpha, the clock controlled gene Dbp and Arylalkylamine-N-acetyltransferase were investigated, as well as melatonin content. No oscillations were observed in the expression of the investigated genes from the control group. Under Standard NE stimulation, the clock genes did not exhibit a rhythmic pattern of expression. However, in the NE-synchronized condition, a rhythmic expression pattern was observed in all cases. An enhancement in pineal gland responsiveness to NE stimulation, reflected in an advanced synthesis of melatonin was also observed. Our results reinforce our previous hypothesis that NE synchronization of pineal gland culture mimics the natural rhythmic release of NE in the gland, increasing melatonin synthesis and keeping the pineal circadian clock synchronized, ensuring the fine adjustments that are relied in the clockwork machinery. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据