4.3 Article

The restorative effect of intramuscular injection of tetanus toxin C-fragment in hemiparkinsonian rats

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.04.008

关键词

C-terminal domain of the heavy chain of tetanus toxin; Motor asymmetry; Neurodegeneration; Restoration; Substantia nigra pars compacta; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion of the Spanish government [SAF2009-13626]
  2. CONACyT [277954]
  3. [VIEP-BUAP-2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The C-terminal domain of the heavy chain of tetanus toxin (Hc-TeTx) is a peptide that has a neuroprotective action against dopaminergic damage by MPP+, both in vitro and in vivo. The trophic effects of Hc-TeTx have been related to its ability to activate the pathways of the tropomyosin receptor kinase, which are crucial for survival process. Our group had previously shown neuroprotective effect of intramuscular Hc-TeTx treatment on animals with a dopaminergic lesion; however, there is no evidence indicating its restorative effects on advanced dopaminergic neurodegeneration. The aim of our study was to examine the restorative effects of an intramuscular injection of the Hc-TeTx fragment on the nigrostriatal system of hemiparkinsonian rats. The animals were administered with a vehicle or Hc-TeTx (20 mu g/kg) in the gastrocnemius muscle for three consecutive days post-dopaminergic lesion, which was made using 6-hydroxydopamine. Post-Hc-TeTx treatment, the hemiparkinsonian rats showed constant motor asymmetry. Moreover, the ipsilateral striatum of the post-Hc-TeTx group had a lower number of argyrophilic structures and a major immunorreactivity to Tyrosine Hydroxylase in the striatum and the substantia nigra pars compacta compared to the 6-OHDA group. Our results show the restorative effect of the Hc-TeTx fragment during the dopaminergic neurodegeneration caused by 6-OHDA. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据