4.5 Article

Cross-Covariance Functions for Multivariate Geostatistics

期刊

STATISTICAL SCIENCE
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 147-163

出版社

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
DOI: 10.1214/14-STS487

关键词

Asymmetry; co-kriging; multivariate random fields; nonstationarity; separability; smoothness; spatial statistics; symmetry

资金

  1. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1406536] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Continuously indexed datasets with multiple variables have become ubiquitous in the geophysical, ecological, environmental and climate sciences, and pose substantial analysis challenges to scientists and statisticians. For many years, scientists developed models that aimed at capturing the spatial behavior for an individual process; only within the last few decades has it become commonplace to model multiple processes jointly. The key difficulty is in specifying the cross-covariance function, that is, the function responsible for the relationship between distinct variables. Indeed, these cross-covariance functions must be chosen to be consistent with marginal covariance functions in such a way that the second-order structure always yields a nonnegative definite covariance matrix. We review the main approaches to building cross-covariance models, including the linear model of coregionalization, convolution methods, the multivariate Matern and nonstationary and space time extensions of these among others. We additionally cover specialized constructions, including those designed for asymmetry, compact support and spherical domains, with a review of physics-constrained models. We illustrate select models on a bivariate regional climate model output example for temperature and pressure, along with a bivariate minimum and maximum temperature observational dataset; we compare models by likelihood value as well as via cross-validation co-kriging studies. The article closes with a discussion of unsolved problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据