4.3 Review

Oxidative stress in anxiety and comorbid disorders

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 261-275

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.08.007

关键词

Anxiety-like behavior; Depression; Alcohol use disorder; Brain; Antioxidant

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Yrjo Jahnsson Foundation
  4. Yrjo and Tuulikki Ilvonen Foundation
  5. Gyllenberg Foundation
  6. Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas Foundation
  7. Rosalind Frankling Young Investigator Award
  8. Biocenter Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anxiety disorders, depression, and alcohol use disorder are common neuropsychiatric diseases that often occur together. Oxidative stress has been suggested to contribute to their etiology. Oxidative stress is a consequence of either increased generation of reactive oxygen species or impaired enzymatic or nonenzymatic defense against it. When excessive it leads to damage of all major classes of macromolecules, and therefore affects several fundamentally important cellular functions. Consequences that are especially detrimental to the proper functioning of the brain include mitochondrial dysfunction, altered neuronal signaling, and inhibition of neurogenesis. Each of these can further contribute to increased oxidative stress, leading to additional burden to the brain. In this review, we will provide an overview of recent work on oxidative stress markers in human patients with anxiety, depressive, or alcohol use disorders, and in relevant animal models. In addition, putative oxidative stress-related mechanisms important for neuropsychiatric diseases are discussed. Despite the considerable interest this field has obtained, the detailed mechanisms that link oxidative stress to the pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric diseases remain largely unknown. Since this pathway may be amenable to pharmacological intervention, further studies are warranted. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据