4.6 Article

How big should the pilot study for my cluster randomised trial be?

期刊

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 1039-1056

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0962280215588242

关键词

pilot; cluster randomised trial; sample size; intra-cluster correlation

资金

  1. Department of Health [CDF-2016-09-015] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [CDF-2016-09-015] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  3. Asthma UK [AUK-AC-2012-01] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institute for Health Research [CDF-2016-09-015] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is currently a lot of interest in pilot studies conducted in preparation for randomised controlled trials. This paper focuses on sample size requirements for external pilot studies for cluster randomised trials. We consider how large an external pilot study needs to be to assess key parameters for input to the main trial sample size calculation when the primary outcome is continuous, and to estimate rates, for example recruitment rates, with reasonable precision. We used simulation to provide the distribution of the expected number of clusters for the main trial under different assumptions about the natural cluster size, intra-cluster correlation, eventual cluster size in the main trial, and various decisions made at the piloting stage. We chose intra-cluster correlation values and pilot study size to reflect those commonly reported in the literature. Our results show that estimates of sample size required for the main trial are likely to be biased downwards and very imprecise unless the pilot study includes large numbers of clusters and individual participants. We conclude that pilot studies will usually be too small to estimate parameters required for estimating a sample size for a main cluster randomised trial (e.g. the intra-cluster correlation coefficient) with sufficient precision and too small to provide reliable estimates of rates for process measures such as recruitment or follow-up rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据