4.3 Article

Immunohistochemical study of vesicle monoamine transporter 2 in the hippocampal formation of PCP-treated mice

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 125-130

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.06.005

关键词

VMAT2; Schizophrenia; Animal model; Hippocampus; Immunohistochemistry; PCP

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20591400]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20591400] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exact pathophysiology of schizophrenia is unknown despite intensive scientific studies using molecular biology, psychopharmacology, neuropathology, etc. It is thought that neurodevelopmental failures such as neuronal network incompetence and the inappropriate formation of neurons affect the neurotransmitters. Several animal models have been created to investigate the etiology of this disease. In this study, we investigated the expression of vesicle monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), which has a significant role in neurotransmission, in the hippocampal formation in 1-phenylcyclohexylpiperazine (PCP)-treated mice using immunohistochemical staining technique to clarify neuronal abnormalities. PCP-treated mice are thought to be one of novel animal models for schizophrenia. The expression of VMAT2 in the hippocampal formation was significantly reduced overall in the PCP-treated mice compared to that in control (saline-treated) mice, also these reductions were observed throughout the brain. These facts implied that the pathophysiology of this disease involves abnormal monoaminergic transmission through VMAT2, despite PCP was the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that might induce glutamatergic abnormality. Since insufficient or excess release of neurotransmitter might alter neurochemical function and neurotransmission, VMAT2 might be an important target for biological research in psychiatric disease including schizophrenia. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据