4.3 Article

Characterisation of human mesenchymal stem cells following differentiation into Schwann cell-like cells

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 41-49

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.01.010

关键词

Bone marrow stromal cell; Schwann cell; Glial cell; Differentiation; Dorsal root ganglion; Glial growth factor

资金

  1. Rosetrees Trust, Medical Research Council (UK)
  2. Swedish Medical Research Council
  3. Umea University, County of Vasterbotten
  4. Ake Wibergs Stiftelse, Magn
  5. Gunvor and Josef Aner Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell-based therapies provide a clinically applicable and available alternative to nerve autografts. Our previous studies have characterised rat-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and here we have investigated the phenotypic, molecular and functional characteristics of human-derived MSC (hMSC) differentiated along a Schwann cell lineage. The hMSC were isolated from healthy human donors and the identity of the undifferentiated hMSC was confirmed by the detection of MSC specific cells surface markers. The hMSC were differentiated along a glial cell lineage using an established cocktail of growth factors including glial growth factor-2. Following differentiation, the hMSC expressed the key Schwann cell (SC) markers at both the transcriptional and translational level. More importantly, we show the functional effect of hMSC on neurite outgrowth using an in vitro co-culture model system with rat-derived primary sensory neurons. The number of DRG sprouting neurites was significantly enhanced in the presence of differentiated hMSC; neurite length and density (branching) were also increased. These results provide evidence that hMSC can undergo molecular, morphological and functional changes to adopt a SC-like behaviour and, therefore, could be suitable as SC substitutes for nerve repair in clinical applications. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据