4.4 Article

Altered source-based EEG coherence of resting-state sensorimotor network in early-stage Alzheimer's disease compared to mild cognitive impairment

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 558, 期 -, 页码 47-52

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.10.056

关键词

Alzheimer's disease (AD); Mild cognitive impairment (MCI); Spectral power; Sensorimotor; Coherence; Electroencephalography (EEG)

资金

  1. Taipei City Hospital [99TPECH04]
  2. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [V101C-023, V102C-103, VGHUST 102-G7-6-2]
  3. National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan [NSC 98-2321-B-010-007, NSC 99-2321-B-010-004, NSC 99-2628-B-010-011-MY3, NSC 100-2218-E-010-002, NSC 100-2321-B-010-004, NSC 101-2314-B-010-068-MY3, NSC 101-2314-B-075-068-MY2, NSC 102-2221-E-010-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the altered coherence between cortical areas in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been widely studied, it remains unclear whether the source-based coherence measures within sensorimotor network show significant difference between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD. In the present study, resting-state electroencephalographic signals were recorded from 21 MCI and 21 mild AD patients. The spectral power and coherence in the sensorimotor areas were analyzed using the minimum norm estimate (MNE) combined with fast Fourier transform and coherence analysis in delta (1-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), beta (13-25 Hz), and gamma (25-40 Hz) bands. Our results indicated that source-based coherence in AD showed increased delta coherences between the bilateral precentral, left supplementary motor area (SMA) and right precentral, and left SMA and right postcentral areas. However, no significant difference of spectral powers was observed between AD and MCI. To conclude, the phenotype conversion from MCI to AD may be associated with an altered connectivity of the sensorimotor cortical network. This is a promising finding; however, further large-scale studies are needed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据