4.4 Article

Intrathecal carbenoxolone inhibits neuropathic pain and spinal wide-dynamic range neuronal activity in rats after an L5 spinal nerve injury

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 563, 期 -, 页码 45-50

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.01.042

关键词

Glia; Gap junction; Carbenoxolone; Neuropathic pain

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (Beijing, China)
  2. National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland, USA) [NS70814]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal glial gap junctions may play an important role in dorsal horn neuronal sensitization and neuropathic pain. In rats after an L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL), we examined the effects of intrathecal injection of carbenoxolone (CBX), a gap junction decoupler, on neuropathic pain manifestations and on wide-dynamic range (WDR) neuronal activity in vivo. Intrathecal injection of CBX dose-dependently (0.1-50 mu g, 10 mu l) inhibited mechanical hypersensitivity in rats at 2-3 weeks post-SNL. However, the same doses of glycyrrhizic acid (an analogue of CBX that does not affect gap junctions) and mefloquine hydrochloride (a selective neuronal gap junction decoupler) were ineffective. Intrathecal CBX (5 mu g) also attenuated heat hypersensitivity in SNL rats. Further, rats did not develop tachyphylaxis to CBX-induced inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity after repetitive drug treatments (25 mu g/day) during days 14-16 post-SNL. Electrophysiological study in SNL rats showed that spinal topical application of CBX (100 mu g, 50 mu l), which mimics intrathecal drug administration, attenuated WDR neuronal responses to mechanical stimuli and to repetitive intracutaneous electrical stimuli (0.5 Hz) that induce windup, a short-form of activity-dependent neuronal sensitization. The current findings suggest that the inhibition of neuropathic pain manifestations by intrathecal injection of CBX in SNL rats may involve an inhibition of glial gap junctions and an attenuation of WDR neuronal activity in the dorsal horn. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据