4.4 Article

A new method for Schwann-like cell differentiation of adipose derived stem cells

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 551, 期 -, 页码 79-83

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.07.012

关键词

Adipose-derived stem cells; Schwann cells; Differentiation; Nerve injury

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31101779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peripheral nerve repair can be enhanced by Schwann cell transplantation, but the clinical application of this procedure is limited by donor site morbidity and the inability to quickly generate a sufficient number of cells. Thus., alternative cell systems for the generation of Schwann cells are desired. Schwann-like cell induced from adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) may be one of the ideal alternative cell systems for Schwann cell generation. Although co-culture with Schwann cells or chemicals combined with a mixture of glial growth factors are often utilized for Schwann cell-like differentiation of ADSCs, these methods are usually complicated or expensive. In this experiment, the rat sciatic nerve was cut, and then soaked in culture medium for two days. The treated culture medium was used as an induction agent after filtering. The obtained ADSCs were incubated with the above induction culture medium for five days. Then, expression of the typical Schwann cell markers, S-100 and GFAP proteins was determined by immunocytochemical staining and Western blotting. The results showed that almost all of the treated ADSCs displayed a spindle shape like morphology after being incubated with induction culture medium for 24 hand expressed S-100 and GFAP proteins after five days. All of these characteristics of differentiated rat ADSCs were similar to genuine Schwann cells. Thus, this new method, which utilized trophic factors secreted from sciatic nerve leachate, was capable of inducing ADSC differentiation into Schwann-like cell. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据