4.4 Article

Abnormal baseline brain activity in suicidal and non-suicidal patients with major depressive disorder

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 534, 期 -, 页码 35-40

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.032

关键词

Suicidal; Non-suicidal; Major depressive disorder (MDD); Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

资金

  1. National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) [2012AA011603]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB720704]
  3. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [60931003]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61222113, 6121001]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have shown that suicide attempts are strongly associated with major depressive disorder (MDD), and MDD patients who attempt suicide have a high risk of death by suicide throughout their lifetimes. We aimed to explore the differences in resting-state brain activity in MDD patients with and without histories of suicide attempt. We accomplished this using an approach named amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF). ALFF reflects the local properties of specific brain regions and provides direct information about impaired regions. This approach differs from functional connectivity. In this study, we compared three groups: MDD patients with and without histories of suicide attempt, and normal controls (NC). The main result is that suicide attempters had increased ALFF in the right superior temporal gyrus (r-STG) relative to both non-suicidal patients (NSU) and NC. In addition, NSU had increased ALFF in the right ventral medial frontal gyrus (r-vMFG) relative to both suicide attempters (SU) and NC. Finally, both NSU and SU had increased ALFF in the left anterior cingulated cortex (l-ACC) and right parahippocampal gyrus (r-PG) and decreased ALFF in the left middle occipital gyrus (l-MOG) and left angular gyms (l-AG) relative to NC. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据