4.4 Article

ADAMTS1, ADAMTS5, ADAMTS9 and aggrecanase-generated proteoglycan fragments are induced following spinal cord injury in mouse

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 544, 期 -, 页码 25-30

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.064

关键词

ADAMTS; Aggrecanase; Spinal cord injury; Astrocytes

资金

  1. Turgut Ozal University
  2. Okayama University Scientific Research Program
  3. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) grant [SBAG 3501]
  4. Japan Society of Promotion Science (JSPS)
  5. Takeda Science Foundation Post Doctoral Research Scholarship
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23592164, 23390366, 23390348, 24659590] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ADAMTS (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs) proteinases are involved in a variety of biological processes such as angiogenesis, cancer and arthritis. ADAMTSs appears to be responsible for the cleavage of proteoglycans in several tissues including brain and cartilage. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) maintains the integrity of the brain extracellular matrix and major inhibitory contributors for glial scar and neural plasticity. The activity of aggrecanases in the central nervous system (CNS)has been reported. ADAMTSs are an enzyme degrading CSPGs in the brain. However, there is a little knowledge regarding ADAMTSs in the CNS. We investigated the expression levels of ADAMTSs mRNAs by RT-PCR after spinal cord injury in mouse. Transcripts encoding 4 of the 19 known ADAMTSs were evaluated in the mouse spinal cord following injury. ADAMTS1, -5 and -9 expression levels were found to be upregulated. No change was observed in ADAMTS4 expression. By means of immunohistochemistry, ADAMTSs were detected in the astrocytes implying its cellular source in SCI. Western blot analyses indicated that aggrecanase-generated proteoglycan fragments are produced after SCI. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据