4.4 Article

Nicotine promotes survival of cells expressing amyloid precursor protein and presenilin: Implication for Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 535, 期 -, 页码 57-61

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.12.046

关键词

Nicotine; Neuroprotection; Beta amyloid; APP; Presenilin; N2a cells; Alzheimer's disease

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [S06 GM008016, 2 SO6 GM08016-39] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid-beta protein (A beta) accumulation is one of the major hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and plays a crucial role in its pathogenesis. Cellular models whereby amyloid precursor protein (APP) is highly expressed are commonly used to test the efficacy of novel neuroprotective compounds. In addition to A beta, it is known that mutation in the protein presenilin contributes to early onset AD. Recently, a cellular neuroblastoma model where both APP and presenilin are expressed has become available. Since protective effects of nicotine against various neurotoxins have been observed, this study was designed to determine whether nicotine would also protect against cellular damage induced by APP or APP and presenilin. Wild type neuroblastoma (N2a) cell line, and those transfected with amyloid precursor protein (APP), and the combination of APP and presenilin were pretreated with various concentrations of nicotine and the survivability of the cells were determined by MU assay. Nicotine dose dependently provided protection against cellular loss in all cell lines, with highest protection in the double transfected (44%) followed by single transfected (30%), and wild type (21%). The effects of nicotine in turn were blocked by mecamylamine, a non-selective nicotinic antagonist. These results suggest differential sensitivity of cell lines representing AD pathology to the protective effects of nicotine and provide further support of therapeutic potential of nicotinic agonists in at least a subtype of AD patients. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据