4.4 Article

The discovery of 071031B, a novel serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 544, 期 -, 页码 68-73

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.076

关键词

Antidepressants; Dual reuptake inhibitors; Behavioral despair models; Monoamine transporters; Integrated evaluation system

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30973516, 81274117]
  2. National Key New Drug Creation Program [2012ZX09102101-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Depression is a severe mood disorder with increasing morbidity and suicidality, while the current therapy is not satisfactory. Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have been reported to have higher efficacy and/or faster acting rate than commonly used antidepressants. The present study was designed to screen the potential SNRIs, using in vitro radioligand receptor binding assays and in vivo animal tests, and introduced the discovery of 071031B. In the tail suspension test and forced swimming test in mice, six compounds (071017S, 071026W, 071031A, 071031B, 080307A and 080307B) showed robust antidepressant activity, without stimulant effect on the locomotor activity or other side effects, and the minimal effective dose of 071017S, 071026W, 071031A and 071031B was less than that of duloxetine; in vitro binding tests indicated that 071031B had high affinity to both serotonin transporter and noradrenaline transporter with similar inhibitory rates to duloxetine at 1 and 100 nM; acute toxicity test indicated that the LD50 value of 071031B was similar to that of duloxetine. These findings demonstrated that this integrated system, combining high throughput screening technology and in vivo animal tests, is effective to screen potential monoamine reuptake inhibitors fast and accurately; 071031B is expected to be a novel serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor for its robust antidepressant activity and transporter affinity. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据